But it’s Complicated. And, of course, OFCCP’s Enforcement Scheme will “not go gentle into that good night.” The case decision is Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy (Case No. 22-859; i.e., “SEC decision”). The Seventh Amendment (passed in 1791) to the...
Part 2: New OFCCP Directive on “Pay Equity Audits” Raises More Questions Than it Answers
E-Verify Released New Features
OFCCP’s Proposed NPRM Walks Backwards Promising Less Transparency in Audits and Unknown, But Different (to come), Evidentiary Standards in Discrimination Investigations
CA Pay Data Reports Show No Surprises and Do not Tell us Much
New Resources Available for EEO-1 Filers
Lilly Ledbetter Shared Her Powerful and History-Making Story
SCOTUS Overturns 5th Circuit, Stays U.S. District Court Injunction of DoD COVID-19 Vaccination Mandate
On Monday December 7, 2020, OFCCP issued a press release announcing that it would soon publish its Final Rule updating OFCCP’s Rules re religious discrimination titled: “Implementing Legal Requirements Regarding the Equal Opportunity Clause’s Religious Exemption.”...
SCOTUS hearing on compelled employee arbitration agreements banning class actions is too close to call
The Trump Team has finally arrived at Wage & Hour Division
Who is a joint employer? The confusion continues…
Trump Administration expanded religious exemption for companies objecting to provision of certain contraceptive services in employer health service plans
US Attorney Sessions threatened vigorous enforcement against employers and government contractors of claimed religious discrimination
In today’s edition of OFCCP Week in Review (WIR), John C. Fox and Candee Chambers discuss the joint resolution passed by the U.S. Senate killing the FAR Council’s rule implementing Fair Pay & Safe Workplaces Executive Order; SCOTUS declines to hear Grimm transgender bathroom case; Trump sends Acosta USDOL Secretary nomination to the U.S. Senate; and Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals holds that Title VII does not protect against sexual orientation, while still protecting “gender non-conformity”.